Publications

Dealing with adverse events: a meta-analysis on second victims' coping strategies  (2020)

Authors:
Busch, Isolde M; Moretti, Francesca; Purgato, Marianna; Barbui, Corrado; Wu, Albert W; Rimondini, Michela
Title:
Dealing with adverse events: a meta-analysis on second victims' coping strategies
Year:
2020
Type of item:
Articolo in Rivista
Tipologia ANVUR:
Articolo su rivista
Language:
Inglese
Format:
Elettronico
Referee:
Name of journal:
JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY
ISSN of journal:
1549-8417
N° Volume:
16
Number or Folder:
2
Page numbers:
e51-e60
Keyword:
second victim; mental health; adverse event; human factors; risk
Short description of contents:
OBJECTIVES: Despite the critical need to understand the diverse responses by second victims to adverse events, there has not been a meta-analysis examining coping by second victims. We aimed to analyze the coping strategies applied by second victims in the aftermath of adverse events. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of nine electronic databases up to October 2018 and screened additional sources, such as gray databases. Two independent reviewers conducted the search, selection process, quality appraisal, data extraction, and synthesis. In case of dissent, a third reviewer was involved to reach consensus. Quantitative studies of the frequency with which coping strategies were applied by second victims were eligible for inclusion. We calculated the overall frequency of coping strategies and I statistic using random effects modeling. RESULTS: Of 10,705 records retrieved, 111 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and 14 studies eventually included. The five most frequent coping strategies were Changing work attitude (89%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 80-94), Following policies and guidelines more accurately and closely (89%, 95% CI = 54-98), Paying more attention to detail (89%, 95% CI = 78-94) (task oriented), Problem-solving/concrete action plan (77%, 95% CI = 59-89) (task oriented), and Criticizing or lecturing oneself (74%, 95% CI = 47-90) (emotion oriented). CONCLUSIONS: Second victims frequently used task- and emotion-oriented coping strategies and, to a lesser degree, avoidance-oriented strategies. To better support second victims and ensure patient safety, coping strategies should be evaluated considering the positive and negative effects on the clinician's personal and professional well-being, relationships with patients, and the quality and safety of healthcare.
Web page:
https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000661
Product ID:
113392
Handle IRIS:
11562/1013562
Last Modified:
November 28, 2022
Bibliographic citation:
Busch, Isolde M; Moretti, Francesca; Purgato, Marianna; Barbui, Corrado; Wu, Albert W; Rimondini, Michela, Dealing with adverse events: a meta-analysis on second victims' coping strategies «JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY» , vol. 16 , n. 22020pp. e51-e60

Consulta la scheda completa presente nel repository istituzionale della Ricerca di Ateneo IRIS

Related projects
Title Department Managers
withstand Department Neuroscienze, Biomedicina e Movimento Michela Rimondini
<<back

Activities

Research facilities

Share