Publications

Authors:

Rimondini, M.; Busch, ISOLDE MARTINA; Mazzi, M. A.; Donisi, V.; Poli, A.; Bovolenta, Elena; Moretti, F.

Title:

Patient empowerment in risk management: a mixed-method study to explore mental health professionals' perspective

Year:

2019

Type of item:

Articolo in Rivista

Tipologia ANVUR:

Articolo su rivista

Language:

Inglese

Format:

Elettronico

Referee:

Sì

Name of journal:

BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH

ISSN of journal:

1472-6963

N° Volume:

19

Number or Folder:

382

Page numbers:

1-12

Keyword:

Focus group; Mental health; Mixed-method; Patient empowerment; Patient-safety; Psychiatry; Risk assessment; Risk management

Short description of contents:

BACKGROUND: In the last years, patients' empowerment has been increasingly recognized as a crucial dimension of patient-centered healthcare and patient safety. Nevertheless, little work has been done so far in the field of patient safety to investigate strategies for empowering psychiatric patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify, by using focus groups, whether and how psychiatric patients' empowerment can improve risk management according to the perspective of healthcare providers (HPs). METHODS: A mixed-method approach composed of a qualitative data collection method (i.e., focus groups) and a quantitative analysis technique (i.e., inductive content analysis) was applied. HPs working in mental health settings shared their perspectives on psychiatric patients' empowerment in risk management. After the transcription of the audio-taped discussions and the subsequent development of a hierarchical four-level coding system (strategy versus critical issue, thematic area, category, subcategory), two independent raters codified the transcripts and synthesized the content. Absolute frequencies are reported for quantitative data. RESULTS: Twelve focus groups consisting of six to ten participants, each with an overall sample size of 95 participants (65 women; average age ± SD 47 ± 9 yrs), were enrolled. A total of 1252 participants' verbal contributions (i.e., units of analysis) were assessed. Strategies and critical issues (Level 1) were mentioned almost equally (52 and 48%, respectively) by the HPs. Most of the contributions at Level 2 referred to the thematic areas Treatment and Cure (69%) and Emergency Management (21%). In the area Treatment and Cure, the category Therapeutic Compliance (Level 3) was discussed in one third of all contributions. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that HPs consider patients as crucial partners in risk management and expect them to play a key role in actively enhancing safety. Policy makers should be aware that risk management in mental health settings particularly relies on the therapeutic relationship between HPs and patients. Therefore, allocating sufficient human and financial resources to mental health care aiming to further support the relationship between patients and HPs is of utmost importance.

Web page:

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4215-x

Product ID:

108904

Handle IRIS:

11562/996190

Last Modified:

November 11, 2022

Bibliographic citation:

Rimondini, M.; Busch, ISOLDE MARTINA; Mazzi, M. A.; Donisi, V.; Poli, A.; Bovolenta, Elena; Moretti, F., Patient empowerment in risk management: a mixed-method study to explore mental health professionals' perspective «BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH» , vol. 19 , n. 382 , 2019 , pp. 1-12

Consulta la scheda completa presente nel repository istituzionale della Ricerca di Ateneo