Pubblicazioni

Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychosocial interventions for PTSD, depression, and anxiety in asylum seekers, refugees, and other migrant populations: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled studies  (2025)

Autori:
Turrini, Giulia; Purgato, Marianna; Cadorin, Camilla; Bartucz, Monica; Cristofalo, Doriana; Gastaldon, Chiara; Nosè, Michela; Ostuzzi, Giovanni; Papola, Davide; Prina, Eleonora; Tedeschi, Federico; Witteveen, Anke B.; Sijbrandij, Marit; Barbui, Corrado
Titolo:
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychosocial interventions for PTSD, depression, and anxiety in asylum seekers, refugees, and other migrant populations: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled studies
Anno:
2025
Tipologia prodotto:
Articolo in Rivista
Tipologia ANVUR:
Articolo su rivista
Lingua:
Inglese
Formato:
Elettronico
Referee:
Nome rivista:
THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE
ISSN Rivista:
2666-7762
N° Volume:
48
Numero o Fascicolo:
101152
Intervallo pagine:
1-17
Parole chiave:
Anxiety; Asylum seekers; Depression; Mental health; Migrants; Post-traumatic stress; Psychosocial interventions; Refugees
Breve descrizione dei contenuti:
Background: Migrant populations are at increased risk of developing mental health problems. We aimed to compare the efficacy and acceptability of psychosocial interventions in this population. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA). Cochrane Central Register of randomised trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, PTSDpubs, PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from database inception to October 7, 2024, to identify randomized clinical trials assessing the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for migrant populations in reducing symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression or anxiety. Studies with second-generation migrants were excluded if they comprised over 20% of participants. Two independent researchers screened, reviewed, and extracted data. The primary outcomes were the severity of PTSD, depression, and anxiety symptoms at post-intervention. Secondary outcomes included acceptability. Standardised mean differences (SMDs) and risk ratios (RRs) were pooled using pairwise and NMA. PROSPERO: CRD42023418817. Findings: Of the 103 studies with 19,230 participants included, 96 contributed to the meta-analyses for at least one outcome, with women representing 64% of the participants. Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET), counselling, Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), and creative expressive interventions demonstrated greater efficacy than treatment as usual (TAU) in reducing PTSD symptoms, with SMDs [95% Confidence Intervals (CIs)] ranging from −0.69 [−1.14, −0.24] to −0.60 [−1.20, −0.01], albeit with low confidence in the evidence. For depressive symptoms, Integrative therapy emerged as the top intervention compared to TAU, with moderate confidence (SMD [95% CI] = −0.70 [−1.21, −0.20]). For anxiety symptoms, NET, Integrative therapy, and Problem Management Plus (PM+)/Step-by-Step (SbS) were more effective than TAU, with SMDs [95% CIs] ranging from −1.32 [−2.05, −0.59] to −0.35 [−0.65, −0.05]. Still, the confidence in the evidence was low. Overall, head-to-head comparisons yielded inconclusive results, and the acceptability analysis revealed variations across interventions. 16% of the studies (17 studies) were classified as “high risk” of bias, 68% (70) as having “some concerns”, and 18% (19) as “low risk”. We identified considerable heterogeneity (I2 of >70%). Interpretation: The analysis revealed no clear differences in the efficacy of psychosocial interventions compared to TAU for reducing symptoms of PTSD, depression, and anxiety. While certain interventions showed potential benefits, confidence in these findings was generally low, limiting the ability to draw definitive conclusions about their comparative effectiveness. Funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency. © 2024 The Author(s)
Pagina Web:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101152
Id prodotto:
143081
Handle IRIS:
11562/1146803
ultima modifica:
9 marzo 2025
Citazione bibliografica:
Turrini, Giulia; Purgato, Marianna; Cadorin, Camilla; Bartucz, Monica; Cristofalo, Doriana; Gastaldon, Chiara; Nosè, Michela; Ostuzzi, Giovanni; Papola, Davide; Prina, Eleonora; Tedeschi, Federico; Witteveen, Anke B.; Sijbrandij, Marit; Barbui, Corrado, Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychosocial interventions for PTSD, depression, and anxiety in asylum seekers, refugees, and other migrant populations: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled studies «THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE» , vol. 48 , n. 1011522025pp. 1-17

Consulta la scheda completa presente nel repository istituzionale della Ricerca di Ateneo IRIS

<<indietro

Attività

Strutture

Condividi